Engagement is Dead. The New Metric is Attention.

by Social Fresh on Jan 09, 2018
See top industry experts speak at Social Fresh 2018 / Dec. 5-7
Where social marketers go to get inspired. Speakers include BET, American Cancer Society, 5/3 Bank, Duke University, Sallie Mae, IBM, Darden, Georgia State University, Chris Brogan, Brian Fanzo, Ekaterina Walter, and more.
>> Reserve your seat today

Guest post by Carrie Kerpen, CEO of Likeable Media and author of the book “Work It: Secrets for Success from the Boldest Women in Business

Title image of article: Audience faces stage. Text reads "Engagement is dead. The new metric is attention."

At the dawn of social media (2004 if you start at Facebook, 1997 if you are a Six Degrees purist), the mark of personal popularity was friend count. You wanted to make new friends so you could build up your network.

In 2006, Facebook launched the News Feed while Twitter joined the party with a 140-character limit, but the real breakthrough didn’t happen until 2009. That was the year Mark Zuckerberg rolled out the Like button–and lo, the miracle of direct, measurable consumer engagement came to be.

For the next five years, friend/fan count and engagement became the currency of social media. Without the option of paid ads, social was a purely earned media platform that brands were forced to approach just like any other teenager: start a page, build a following, post content, get engagement.

Engagements were valuable not just because they validated a brand’s social existence, but because each engagement generated a news item that was shared to friends’ feeds. This was the only way, within the platform, for brands to reach new people outside of their fan base.

All of the social networks encouraged brands to post as frequently as possible, hungry for content that would keep their users entertained. Facebook actually penalized accounts that did not post at least once a day. Understandably, brands took their cues and posted often to increase engagement.

In 2013, the first social advertising became available on Facebook. Not much changed at first other than fan acquisition and paid engagement getting supercharged with incoming cash. But eventually, two important things happened.

First, Facebook realized it was giving away what it wanted brands to pay for via organic reach. This led to Reachaggedon. In less than a year, organic reach for brands dropped from 10-15% to below 1%, rendering most fan bases largely irrelevant.

The second important event was that Facebook discovered it couldn’t prove the ROI on engagement. The problem was (and is) that people willing to engage with a brand are not always the most valuable customers, and vice versa. Plenty of loyal customers are ready and willing to buy your product, but have zero interest in engaging with your brand’s social ads—or any social ad—ever.

By running a campaign optimized for engagement, a marketer is instructing Facebook to:

  • Serve the designated ads to people it knows tend to engage with branded content.
  • Actively exclude everyone else, including current or potential customers.

Hypothetically, let’s assume (very generously) that 50% of a brand’s customers are willing to engage with an ad. This means that every engagement campaign excludes at least half of all potential customers.

That’s definitely not a smart business strategy. But if not engagement, what social metric does drive business results at the top of the sales funnel?

Interestingly, the answer is something close to a GRP or impression. Facebook calls it the Brand Awareness objective and measures it via Estimated Ad Recall Lift (EARL): the number of people who are likely to remember your ad two days after seeing it.

The exact formula for EARL is secret, but what it all boils down to is relative attention. The following example scenarios* help explain the concept:

  • A 13-year-old is a hyper-fast scroller and spends an average of 100 milliseconds eyeing each piece of content. If she spends just half a second (500 milliseconds) on your ad, Facebook deems that she has paid attention.
  • On the other end of the spectrum, you have an aging Boomer who spends an average of 30 seconds eyeing everything in her feed. When served an ad, she spends 31 seconds on it. This is not significantly more attention, so Facebook notes the impression but does not count it toward a lift in Brand Awareness.

*the numbers below are illustrative and do not indicate how Facebook actually performs the calculations.

For marketers who use social for non-DR purposes, the message is clear. Fans and engagement remain something unique to social and are fundamental to why people use those platforms. They will continue to have value. Focusing solely on those two metrics, however, can severely limit the potential of the social medium.

Instead, marketers should focus on investing in good content that grabs attention and stops the thumb. Pair that with the right paid strategy to reach the right people and that’s what will earn brands the best return on their social investment.

Post Author

Your secret weapon to social media success. Social Fresh is a social marketing conference that takes place twice a year....

  • Jason Freeman

    Most companies use content marketers to be able to at least capture the curiosity their audience. Aside from that, there are no other strategies that I could think of to make readers engage with the content.

    Unless your business involves online selling, the best thing you could do is to get word out that your company exists. That’s all that matters.
    Like what the article said; there are customers that are interested in buying products or services but are not interested in engaging with the content.

  • I think even with online selling, getting the word out is essential. For Social Fresh Conference for instance, our main product, we always see purchase lift with strong word of mouth or just good awareness ad efforts.

  • Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you are stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a great website.

  • Porter Bayne

    Does anyone have data on Estimated Ad Recall Lift (EARL) rates?

    We’re running some video campaigns in our area, and curious how we’re performing here compared to other advertisers. We are new, too, so I wonder if that factors into EARL (I figure I am more likely to remember a Coke ad b/c I know Coke, vs. an ad from a company I’ve never heard of).